Contact me - 3dbabyblog@gmail.com
If you click on the images they will open up in a bigger window.

Wednesday 28 July 2010

World's first hands on review of Panasonic HDC-SDT750

This is a little rushed, as I have to take Oscar for his jabs today!

Today Panasonic announced their new consumer 3D camcorder.

Sometimes, when the wind is right, I get to try out pre production prototypes before the likes of Philip Bloom or Vincent Laforet get their hands on them. I got to play with one of these last week.

Two things come to mind.

1. It's fantastic
2. I hate it.*

I've been shooting 3D since buying my first Bolex 16mm with stereo lens in 1989. It's a fun and challenging pastime. 3D has always been a fairly complicated affair. It takes a lot of specialist equipment, time to calculate inter axial distances, planning for stereo window violations, convergence, depth budgets, camera sync etc. All this means that simply put, not many people know how to do it properly.

Now along come Panasonic with this point and shoot camera that delivers stunning 3D images with no need for any special 3D knowledge. Suddenly it becomes difficult to persuade clients that there is a dark art to 3D.**

Ok, so this £1300 camcorder is not about to replace a dual Red system or Arri Alexia, but for weddings, babies, parties, holidays and low budget film makers, 3D is now a very viable option.

How it works.

3D is accomplished by a newly designed lens system that attaches to the front of the camera along with some nifty processing within the camera body. There are two locating pins on the lens which tell the camera to switch into 3D mode.
The attachment actually houses two separate auto focus lenses that resolve left and right images side by side onto the sensor as two 16:9 images. This means both 'eyes' are captured at exactly the same moment so it is possible to film fast action without trouble.

It's not technically capturing 1080p in 3D mode as only half the resolution from each side of the sensor is used for each eye. This is not as bad at it might sound - all the 3D broadcasts from Sky etc. use this method to squeeze two images into one for 3D. A 3D capable TV will recognize the image as 3D and stretch each eye back to 1920x1080.

Something I've noticed from digital 3D editing is that when the brain is delivered two images it somehow averages out any noise or picture artefacts. Although the image produced by the HDC-SDT750 has technically been upsampled to give 1080p, the perceived image quality is much better than you might expect and far better than a 2D image would be if upsampled to the same degree.

Up close and personal

The distance between the lenses (Inter axial distance) is around 20mm which means it is possible to film objects as close as 1m, a feat that would otherwise require a hugely complicated and expensive mirror rig. Even the professional $21,000 AG3DA1 3D camcorder cannot shoot as close as this. In my experiments I found you could actually get as close as 40cms as long as your close subject didn't cover the edges of the picture. This results in negative parallax, or the 'things poking out of the screen at you' effect.

Other features

Aside from 3D, the camera body is pretty much state of the art. I won't go into these in detail but I will give you a somewhat lazy list.
Optical image stabilisation, touch screen control, leica lens, time lapse recording, manual control ring for focus/exposure, 1080p@50fps (first of it's kind to offer this), pre rec (camera can be set to always be recording, so if you miss a goal then hit record it will 'backdate' the start by 3 seconds and you get your shot!)

What can you do with the footage?
As it's AVCHD you can burn it straight to bluray and it will playback in 3D on a 3D TV. Panasonic also include software to edit and make standard DVDs.
You can also shoot best in class 2D video by simply removing the 3D lens.

I was allowed to shoot some 3D test footage and I will post a link to this in youtube's 3D format as soon as I have permission.

Disclaimer. I get to play with kit from Panasonic as I know some folks there, they don't pay me to do this or let me keep the gear :(
Also the camera I used was a one off hand built prototype, so things may change (read get better) by the time it hits production.
I regularly use Lumix cameras, but I also use Canon and Sony.

EDIT 31/07/10: A friend of mine (Ian from Superteam films http://www.houseofhellmovie.com/#vid) pointed out that I didn't mention that this new camcorder does not use the anaglyph red/green system that my images on the blog are created with. What you get is full colour 3D like you see at the cinema.

* Not really.
** There is! There is! It's really hard to do.

7 comments:

  1. Look like slide copy adapter
    inside in addition to regular small lenses from compact cameras there are two small anamorphic lenses that Panasonic used in prosumer camcorders to convert 4x3 sensor to 16:9 and call it 'Native':-) The place where the slide goes is replaced by frosty glass
    and when connected to main body the main lens is set to narrow angle macro to focus on the frosty glass.
    Such design look like cheep consumer reaction test gadget using parts from other non 3D products.
    The 20 mm base and no stereoscopic preview makes it a highly overpriced 3D Gimmick device.

    Mathew Orman

    ReplyDelete
  2. I didn't notice 'frosty' glass (you mean like a 35mm DOF adapter for HDV cameras?) - it looked clear all the way through. Also, there are no anamorphic lenses. I tried it on a SD700 and although I couldn't get it focussed, what I could see were two 16:9 images side by side. It's closer in design to the Loreo 35mm SLR 3D lens.


    The 20mm IA is actually a great plus. (3D in your username, surely this makes sense to you?) Smaller the IA, better the close 3D, and that's where most family filming will happen, 1m-3m.

    I agree, it's expensive! I was hoping for sub £1000. Then again, I remember paying nearly £1500 for a Sony mini DV camera in 1995. Give it time and I'm sure they will become much more affordable.

    What you're paying for is easy of use, and there's no other product in the market that can do what the SDT750 does. Forget the Aiptek, the image quality is horrific.

    I'm expecting to see bundle deals with Panasonic 3DTVs/Bluray players.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well if you do not see anamorphic compression in viewfinder then bottom and top should have black bars since 16:9 aspect of viewfinder is not compatible with 32:9 format. Also 20 mm base will make viewing
    of scenes enlarged in scale and very unnatural.
    Finally there is no specification of stereoscopic geometry. Are the axes parallel or toed-in?

    Mathew Orman

    ReplyDelete
  4. No black bars. The camera interpolates the 16:9 to 8:9 each side before recording. The viewfinder shows the left eye, in 16:9, in 2D.

    Enlargement is no different than you might expect from shooting anything close-up in 2D. 3D effect and scaling effects are affected by your screen size of course. It seemed to be well set up for the 50" set I demoed it on.

    I hear from CML that a current big budget hollywood movie is using IA of 10mm and less for some scenes. I personally witnessed Max shooting parts of Streetdance with similarly small IA. The upcoming Sony Pro 3D camcorder is supposedly going to have IA of 25mm.

    I'm not sure if there is any toe in. It could only be very slight and may well be being corrected with achromatic prisms.

    When I get hold of it again, I'll take a better look to see if I can make out any of the construction. I do know that the one I used is a hand built sample (rough edges, rapid prototyping marks etc) so things could well change before it goes into production.

    The main thing with this product is, is it good enough to impress Joe Average who just bought a 3D TV. Answer: Yes.

    Will it replace the $21,000 AG3D-A1? : No. But I tell you what, having spent four days shooting with the pro camera, I would welcome strapping one of these on it's hotshoe to catch the times when the subject strays closer than 2m. I bet people end up doing just that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just got two Panasonic TM700's a month ago for shooting 3D with... from your experience is there any chance the conversion lens will work with these? Or is there something different in the camera (aside from upscaling the left eye on the viewfinder) that would prevent this? From what I can tell from the specs they're nearly identical to the 750.

    I'd love to be able to shoot close-ups, but I can't afford to buy another camera for a while...

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Ryan. That's interesting - as you can see from this blog one of my rigs is two TZ7's hooked up for 3D. How do you get on with sync? Does it drift over time?

    The 3D lens has two small metal tabs that centre it onto the main body. The SDT750 has two corresponding holes which the front of the TM700 doesn't have. Thinking about it, that's probably why I couldn't achieve focus with the 3D lens in front of the TM700 - the tabs stopped me being able to get the lens close enough to the body.
    I guess if you either chopped the tabs off, or dremelled a couple of holes in the TM700's front you should be able to make it work, but I must stress this is a guess.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi 3D Daddy,

    Thank you for the interesting review. I'm planning on getting this camcorder when it launches for a short film project, but I'm worried about the editing part. I already have an AVCHD Sony camcorder, and it's really painful to edit. My mac can't even play the footage, so I use Sony Vegas on my PC and it's very slow. I'm guessing it's going to be the same, but how does one edit 3D footage exactly? Can I use any program and burn the exported video file to blu-ray with the included software?

    Finally, have you gotten permission to post your 3D footage? :)

    Thank you very much,

    Benoit

    ReplyDelete

Hi, please comment but, please don't use any language you wouldn't want my Mum to read!